Grajaú The best way to watch almost any golf tournament is on TV. That’s especially true of the Ryder Cup, because at any moment there’s hardly anything going on. I’ve been to just one Ryder Cup in person—in 1993, on the Brabazon course at The Belfry, in England—and it was a spectator’s nightmare. The most coveted seats, initially, were in an enclosed multistory grandstand beside the eighteenth green, and people who had passes for it began arriving long before the first match teed off. They then waited for almost twelve hours with nothing to watch except one another getting drunk, because on the first day only one of the eight matches—the afternoon four-ball between Nick Faldo and Colin Montgomerie, for the Europeans, and Paul Azinger and Fred Couples, for the United States—made it to the eighteenth hole.
http://preferredmode.com/2014/03/17/monster-track-xv/ The Belfry, like most of the courses where the Europeans hold the Ryder Cup, is a dud. The nicest thing that Ron Whitten could find to say about it, in Golf Digest’s 1993 Ryder Cup preview, was that its blandness would prevent it from intruding on the golf—perhaps the faintest possible praise for a championship layout. It’s also the opposite of a stadium course. There are no hillsides or mounds for spectators to stand on, and in 1993 the trees were way too small to climb. I saw one man standing on a paint can, which he had somehow smuggled past the guards at the gate, and I saw many people standing on small stools, also smuggled. Because the viewing opportunities were so meager, there were crowds surrounding the few available television sets. There was one in the Lloyd’s pharmacy tent, and one in the exhibition tent, and one in a rowdy refreshment tent near the tenth fairway. Medinah Country Club is far more spectator-friendly, but if you’re watching from home you should still count yourself lucky.
buy Seroquel on line without a rx You should also be grateful that the broadcast isn’t being handled by the BBC. In 1993, Tom Kite would be putting for eagle somewhere, but on the screen you would see Colin Montgomerie practicing a putt he had just missed, or Nick Faldo standing by his golf bag, chatting with his caddie. The camera operators couldn’t track balls in the air and had trouble finding them when they were on the ground. The producers would suddenly cut to Barry Lane, picking him up in mid-follow-through, and the sound equipment on the course looked like Second World War surplus. The BBC has improved since then, but not enough. In the TV Cup, the USA wins every time.
Ostrava My goodness, Mr Owen, your writings have been descending further and further into mindless drivel. Unfortunately, I’ve gotten sick of it before you did, so I bid you farewell. Another reader lost.
Don’t worry David…. any reader who is engaged enough to write a comment won’t actually stop reading. Isn’t that right ‘O’Leary’??
I’ve refunded his blog subscription fee.
Hi David, I liked your post, I have played at the Belfry, but never thought about its disadvantages for watching golf. Golf is a game that is made for TV, the coverage from Sky is good. I feel sorry for the BBC commentators, they must really envy the oppositions coverage of play. Would have said something ungentlemanly about Oleary, but as he is not here there is no point.
Mr. O’Leary that is some extremely constructive criticism. To GBN’s point, I’m sure you’re reading this, otherwise I wouldn’t have wasted my breath. David, count me on the side of very much enjoying your posts!
I’d always suspected the suckiness of watching the Ryder Cup in person, if only for all the drunks either chanting USA or singing Olay Olay Olay, but thanks for the confirmation. And if you need any contributions to help cover the cost of returning O’Leary’s blog subscription fee, do get in touch.